| Type: | Package |
| Title: | Methods Based on the e-Closure Principle |
| Version: | 0.9.2 |
| Maintainer: | Jelle Goeman <j.j.goeman@lumc.nl> |
| Description: | Implements several methods for False Discovery Rate control based on the e-Closure Principle, in particular the Closed e-Benjamini-Hochberg and Closed Benjamini-Yekutieli procedures. |
| License: | GPL-3 |
| Imports: | Rcpp |
| LinkingTo: | Rcpp |
| NeedsCompilation: | yes |
| Encoding: | UTF-8 |
| Suggests: | testthat (≥ 3.0.0) |
| Config/testthat/edition: | 3 |
| RoxygenNote: | 7.3.3 |
| Packaged: | 2026-03-04 11:36:41 UTC; jjgoeman |
| Author: | Jelle Goeman [aut, cre] |
| Repository: | CRAN |
| Date/Publication: | 2026-03-09 11:00:09 UTC |
eClosure: Multiple testing methods based on the e-Closure principle
Description
Provides functions for applying the closed e-Benjamini-Hochberg (eBH) and closed Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedures within the e-Closure framework for simultaneous FDR control in multiple hypothesis testing.
Main functions
The two core functions are:
Author(s)
Jelle Goeman
References
Xu, Z., Solari, A., Fischer, L., de Heide, R., Ramdas, A., & Goeman, J. (2025). Bringing closure to false discovery rate control: A general principle for multiple testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02517.
Closed Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure for simultaneous FDR control
Description
Applies the closed testing version of the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY)
procedure. The standard BY procedure controls the false discovery rate (FDR)
at level \alpha under arbitrary dependence but only provides a single
set of rejections. The closed BY procedure provides simultaneous FDR
control: for every set of hypotheses, it determines whether that set can
be reported as discoveries while maintaining FDR control at level
\alpha, regardless of which other sets are inspected.
Usage
closedBY(p, set = NULL, alpha = 0.05, approximate = FALSE)
Arguments
p |
Numeric vector of p-values, one per hypothesis. Values must lie
in |
set |
Optional subsetting vector for |
alpha |
Numeric scalar in |
approximate |
Logical. If |
Details
The closed BY procedure is based on a local e-value for every
intersection hypothesis. A set R of hypotheses is closedBY-significant —
and therefore a valid simultaneous rejection — if and only if, for every
subset S \subseteq [m], the local e-value exceeds
|S \cap R|/|R|\alpha.
This guarantees post-hoc FDR control: you may report any closedBY-significant
set as your discovery set without inflating the FDR above \alpha,
even if the choice of set was data-driven.
The function has two modes:
-
Set-checking mode (when
setis supplied): ReturnsTRUEif the specified set is closedBY-significant (i.e., can be reported as a valid simultaneous rejection at level\alpha), andFALSEotherwise. -
Discovery mode (when
set = NULL): Returns the sizerof the largest closedBY-significant set. Therhypotheses with the smallest p-values always form one such set. This gives the maximum number of hypotheses that can be reported while maintaining simultaneous FDR control. In particular, the setRconsisting of thersmallest p-values is closedBY-significant.
Note that closedBY significance is not a monotone property: a set of size r
being closedBY-significant does not imply that all smaller sets are as well.
The exact algorithm therefore checks all set sizes, while the approximate
algorithm (approximate = TRUE) uses a faster bisection strategy that may
occasionally underestimate the largest significant set.
Value
If
setis supplied: a single logical value.TRUEindicates that the specified set is closedBY-significant and can be reported as a simultaneous rejection at FDR level\alpha.FALSEindicates it cannot.If
set = NULL: a single non-negative integerr. Therhypotheses with the smallest p-values form a valid simultaneous rejection set. A return value of0means no non-empty set can be rejected.
References
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics, 29(4), 1165–1188.
Goeman, J. J., & Solari, A. (2011). Multiple testing for exploratory research. Statistical Science, 26(4), 584–597.
Xu, Z., Solari, A., Fischer, L., de Heide, R., Ramdas, A., & Goeman, J. (2025). Bringing closure to false discovery rate control: A general principle for multiple testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02517.
See Also
p.adjust() for standard p-value-based non-simultaneous multiple testing corrections,
including the BY procedure (method = "BY").
closedeBH() for the analogous procedure based on e-values.
Examples
set.seed(42)
# 20 null hypotheses (p ~ Uniform(0,1)) and 10 non-nulls (p ~ Beta(0.1, 1), smaller on average)
p <- c(runif(20), rbeta(10, 0.1, 1))
# --- Discovery mode ---
# Find the maximum number of simultaneous rejections at FDR level 5%
r <- closedBY(p, alpha = 0.05)
cat("Largest simultaneous rejection set:", r, "\n")
# The r hypotheses with the smallest p-values form a valid discovery set
discovery_set <- p <= sort(p)[r]
cat("P-values in discovery set:", round(sort(p[discovery_set]), 4), "\n")
# --- Set-checking mode ---
# Check whether a researcher-defined set is a valid simultaneous rejection
candidate_set <- p < 0.01
closedBY(p, set = candidate_set, alpha = 0.05)
# --- Exact vs. approximate ---
r_exact <- closedBY(p, alpha = 0.05, approximate = FALSE)
r_approx <- closedBY(p, alpha = 0.05, approximate = TRUE)
cat("Exact:", r_exact, " Approximate:", r_approx, "\n")
Closed eBH procedure for simultaneous FDR control
Description
Applies the closed testing version of the e-BH (e-values Benjamini-Hochberg)
procedure. The standard eBH procedure controls the false discovery rate (FDR)
at level \alpha but only provides a single set of rejections. The closed
eBH procedure provides simultaneous FDR control: for every set of
hypotheses, it determines whether that set can be reported as discoveries
while maintaining FDR control at level \alpha, regardless of which
other sets were inspected.
Usage
closedeBH(e, set = NULL, alpha = 0.05, approximate = FALSE)
Arguments
e |
Numeric vector of e-values, one per hypothesis. E-values must be non-negative; each is interpreted as the evidence against its null hypothesis. The e-values should have expectation at most 1 under the null hypothesis. |
set |
Optional subsetting vector for |
alpha |
Numeric scalar in |
approximate |
Logical. If |
Details
The closed eBH procedure is based on the concept of mean consistency. A
set R of hypotheses is mean consistent — and therefore a valid
simultaneous rejection — if and only if:
\frac{1}{|S|} \sum_{i \in S} e_i \;\geq\; \frac{|S \cap R|}{|R| \cdot \alpha}
is satisfied jointly for all S \subseteq [m], when m hypotheses are tested.
In practice, this condition guarantees
that R is a valid closed-testing rejection, providing post-hoc FDR
control: you may report any mean-consistent set as your discovery set without
inflating the FDR above \alpha, even if the choice of set was
data-driven.
The function has two modes:
-
Set-checking mode (when
setis supplied): ReturnsTRUEif the specified set is mean consistent (i.e., can be reported as a valid simultaneous rejection at level\alpha), andFALSEotherwise. -
Discovery mode (when
set = NULL): Returns the sizerof the largest mean-consistent set. Therhypotheses with the largest e-values always form one such set. This gives the maximum number of hypotheses that can be reported while maintaining simultaneous FDR control.
Note that mean consistency is not a monotone property: a set of size r
being mean consistent does not imply that all smaller sets are as well.
The exact algorithm therefore checks all set sizes, while the approximate
algorithm (approximate = TRUE) uses a faster bisection strategy that may
occasionally underestimate the largest consistent set.
Value
If
setis supplied: a single logical value.TRUEindicates that the specified set is mean consistent and can be reported as a simultaneous rejection at FDR level\alpha.FALSEindicates it cannot.If
set = NULL: a single non-negative integerr. Therhypotheses with the largest e-values form a valid simultaneous rejection set. A return value of0means no non-empty set can be rejected.
References
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57(1), 289–300.
Wang, R., & Ramdas, A. (2022). False discovery rate control with e-values. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 84(3), 822–852.
Xu, Z., Solari, A., Fischer, L., de Heide, R., Ramdas, A., & Goeman, J. (2025). Bringing closure to false discovery rate control: A general principle for multiple testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02517.
See Also
p.adjust() for non-simultaneous multiple testing corrections.
Examples
set.seed(42)
# 20 null hypotheses (e ~ Exp(1)) and 10 non-nulls (e ~ Exp(0.1), larger on average)
e <- c(rexp(20, rate = 1), rexp(10, rate = 0.1))
# --- Discovery mode ---
# Find the maximum number of simultaneous rejections at FDR level 5%
r <- closedeBH(e, alpha = 0.05)
cat("Largest simultaneous rejection set:", r, "\n")
# The r hypotheses with the largest e-values form a valid discovery set
discovery_set <- e >= sort(e, decreasing = TRUE)[r]
cat("E-values in discovery set:", round(sort(e[discovery_set], decreasing = TRUE), 2), "\n")
# --- Set-checking mode ---
# Check whether a researcher-defined set is a valid simultaneous rejection
candidate_set <- e > 3
closedeBH(e, set = candidate_set, alpha = 0.05)
# --- Exact vs. approximate ---
r_exact <- closedeBH(e, alpha = 0.05, approximate = FALSE)
r_approx <- closedeBH(e, alpha = 0.05, approximate = TRUE)
cat("Exact:", r_exact, " Approximate:", r_approx, "\n")